Legal Opinion

Barfield v. Gasparri, No. 111081 (Oct. 12, 1993)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 12, 1993No. 111081Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

IN RE: MOTION TO STRIKE #122 A motion to strike is properly used to contest "the legal sufficiency of any answer including any special defense contained therein." Practice Book 152(5); see Gurliacci v. Mayer, 218 Conn. 531, 546, 590 A.2d 914 (1991). When considering a motion to strike, the court must construe the pleading favorably to the non-moving party. Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc., 224 Conn. 210, 215,618 A.2d 25 (1992).

The plaintiffs contend that failure to mitigate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Preston v. KeithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Wilmot v. McPaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  5. Freeman Appeal from Doings of CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API