Legal Opinion

McClenahan v. . Cotten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Civil Action tried at Spring Term, 1880, of Chatham Superior Court, before Seymour,. J. In this action, decided against the plaintiff in a justice’s-court, an appeal was taken to the superior court, and on the hearing, the parties having waived a jury and consented to a trial of all issues of law and fact by the court, His Honor found the facts and the conclusions of law thereon as foL lows: 1. That the bond declared on is the bond of the defendant’s testator and is for the…

Read the full summary

Civil Action tried at Spring Term, 1880, of Chatham Superior Court, before Seymour,. J. In this action, decided against the plaintiff in a justice’s-court, an appeal was taken to the superior court, and on the hearing, the parties having waived a jury and consented to a trial of all issues of law and fact by the court, His Honor found the facts and the conclusions of law thereon as foL lows: 1. That the bond declared on is the bond of the defendant’s testator and is for the sum of $173-.20, bearing interest from the 11th of November 1862. 2. That the sum pleaded as a set-off or counter-claim…

1Opinion of the CourtDillard, J.

The questions presented on the appeal for >our determination are, first, can a defendant, ‘sued in contract in a justice's court plead as a set off an independent cross-demand arising ex-contraotu, the principal of which is beyond the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, and sec•ondly, whether a defendant sued as a personal representative may purchase a claim against a creditor of the estate •subsequently to the death of the decedent, and avail of it as a set-off or counter-claim.

We concur in the opinion of His Honor on the first point, and do not on the second one.

Prior to the statute of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kerchner v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Burrall v. De GrootThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
  3. Prentiss v. GravesNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Mitchell v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sewing Machine Co. v. . BurgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. BurgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Asher v. . ReizensteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Lane v. . RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Weeks v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API