Legal Opinion

Busch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 19, 1989No. 87-2705PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Ruth Busch seeks review of her conviction for DWI-Manslaughter. She argues the trial court erred by instructing the jury to apply a mandatory rebuttable presumption on the issue of intoxication. We agree, but find the error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of appellant’s intoxication. We find no reversi*246ble error among the other issues raised on appeal.

The evidence at trial established appellant was the driver of one of two cars involved in an automobile accident in August 1985, that resulted in the death of the driver of the other car. Appellant sustained injuries and was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Curfew Davis v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Richard Miller v. C.L. Norvell, Sheriff, St. Lucie County Jail, Dr. Barbara Greadington, Commissioner, Fppc and Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gladin v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990
  2. Gladin v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API