Gates v. Board of Education of River Local School District
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchNeider, J.
Jurisdiction of these cases was assumed because the facts indicated a substantial question involving public interest, as that term was construed by the delegates to the Constitutional- Convention of 1912, that is, an interpretation of Section 3319.081, Revised Code,1 relating to the employment of nonteaching personnel by a local board of education, of which there are hundreds in the state.
Thomas A. Gates and Walter J. Nippert, plaintiffs to declaratory judgments in the Common Pleas Court of Monroe *85County, from the affirmance of which these appeals are pursued, were nonteaching employees…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Feterle v. HuettnerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Twin Valley Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- In re Estate of DuiguidOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- In re MullenOhio Supreme Court · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.