Legal Opinion

Gates v. Board of Education of River Local School District

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1967No. Nos. 40598 and 40599PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchNeider, J.

Jurisdiction of these cases was assumed because the facts indicated a substantial question involving public interest, as that term was construed by the delegates to the Constitutional- Convention of 1912, that is, an interpretation of Section 3319.081, Revised Code,1 relating to the employment of nonteaching personnel by a local board of education, of which there are hundreds in the state.

Thomas A. Gates and Walter J. Nippert, plaintiffs to declaratory judgments in the Common Pleas Court of Monroe *85County, from the affirmance of which these appeals are pursued, were nonteaching employees…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Feterle v. HuettnerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Twin Valley Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In re Estate of DuiguidOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In re MullenOhio Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API