Wetzel v. C.A.R.S. Protection Plus, Unpublished Decision (2-17-2006)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant, C.A.R.S. Protection Plus, Inc. ("C.A.R.S."), appeals from the December 9, 2004 decision of the Painesville Municipal Court, entering judgment in the amount of $2,040.56, plus interest, in favor of appellee, Adam Wetzel ("Wetzel"), on his breach of warranty claim. We affirm.

{¶ 2} Wetzel purchased a 1997 Jeep Wrangler in September 2002, from Western Reserve Auto, along with a limited warranty from C.A.R.S., which covered mechanical failure of various components, when such failure was not caused by external influence. In May 2004, the Jeep broke down as Wetzel drove to…