Legal Opinion
Nobers v. Crucible, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 8, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-1822PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ZIEGLER, District Judge.(1) Plaintiffs, former supervisors and managers at the Midland, Pennsylvania steel mill of defendant, Crucible, Inc., now known as Colt Industries Operating Corporation (CIOC), seek damages for alleged breach of express and implied contracts. Defendants are CIOC, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, and Colt Industries, Inc. (Colt), a Pennsylvania corporation also headquartered in New York. CIOC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Colt. Named plaintiffs, two Pennsylvania citizens and two citizens of Ohio, brought this…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Steel Valley Authority v. Union Switch And Signal DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Galgay v. GangloffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Rose v. GiamattiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
- American Dredging Co. v. Atlantic Sea Con, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees of Crucible, Inc. v. NobersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.