Legal Opinion

Potts v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1891No. 3195PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARR, Judge,

Section A.—Mrs. M. E. Potts (now Gibbon) originally instituted this suit against the Western Union Telegraph Company to recover $5000 as damages on account of the negligent failure of the defendant to deliver a certain telegram announcing the fatal sickness of her husband, Frank Potts, now deceased. The suit was begun some time in the spring of 1888, the first amended original petition bearing the file mark as of April 12, 1888. The facts detailed below appear substantially from the second amended original petition, filed April 7, 1890. The appellant, on March 10, 1888, caused the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. LevyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Rowell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BroescheTexas Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Western Union Tel. Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Texas Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. SeidersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API