Legal Opinion

Estopinal v. Vogt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 22, 1908No. 17,008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of Plaquemines, Nemours Henry Núñez, Judge. Separate actions by B. F. Estopinal against George Vogt, George Zibilich, Louis Zettwock, Peter Vogt, George W. Loga, and W. P. Loga, consolidated on appeal. Judgments for plain•tiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.

Six separate suits against as many defendants have been consolidated in this appeal, and have been submitted without brief. The object of the suits is to have the defendants stricken from the registration roll of the parish of Plaquemines fot the alleged reason that they are not residents of the parish. The defendants, except W. P. Loga, are river pilots, plying their vocation between the head of the passes at the mouth of the Misssissippi river and the city of New Orleans. To be at hand when needed, they have to remain constantly, when off duty, at the head of the passes, at Pilot Town, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estopinal v. MichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. GodchauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Fleming v. JoyceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Hodges v. JoyceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API