Legal Opinion

Eldoh v. Astoria Generating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 2008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*604In the absence of a legal duty to indemnify, a contractual promise to indemnify should not be found unless it can be clearly implied from the language and purpose of the entire agreement and the surrounding facts and circumstances (see Altchek v DiGennaro, 214 AD2d 527, 528 [1995]). A contract assuming an obligation of indemnification must be strictly construed to avoid reading into it a duty which the parties did not intend to be assumed (id.). In Flores v Lower E. Side Serv. Ctr., Inc. (4 NY3d 363, 369-370 [2005]), the Court of Appeals held that “the common-law rule—which authorizes review…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Flores v. Lower East Side Services Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Altchek v. DiGennaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alfaro v. 65 West 13th Acquisition, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Baginski v. Queen Grand Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Fatirian v. Monti's Holding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Talapin v. One Madison Avenue CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Saavedra v. 111 John Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API