Legal Opinion
United States v. City & County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 25, 1990No. Civ. Nos. C-84-7089 MHP, C-84-1100 MHPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1371OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
These consolidated actions alleging constitutional and statutory violations arising from racial discrimination and harassment in employment practices were settled pursuant to a Consent Decree filed May 20, 1988. The matter is now before the court on plaintiff-intervenors’ motion to establish the appropriate interest rate on certain backpay awarded pursuant to the consent decree and on defendant’s motion to strike the declaration of William McNeill.
Having considered the papers submitted and the arguments of the parties, for the following reasons, the court grants…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dorothy P. Robinson v. Lorillard Corporation (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carl Johnston v. Harris County Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Nancy FADHL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. City and County San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Davis v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Taylor v. Cent. Pa. Drug & Alcohol Serv. Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Taylor v. Central Pennsylvania Drug & Alcohol Services Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995