Global Reinsurance Corp. v. Equitas Ltd
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Lippman.
At issue is the sufficiency and extraterritorial reach of plaintiffs claim under New York State’s antitrust statute, commonly known as the Donnelly Act (General Business Law § 340 et seq.).
Plaintiff is a New York branch of a German reinsurance corporation. Defendants (hereinafter collectively referred to as Equitas) are London, England based entities engaged in the business of providing retrocessionary reinsurance. Retrocessionary reinsurers, or retrocessionaires as they are known, write coverage for risks ceded to them by reinsurers, in this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Todd v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Texaco Inc. v. DagherSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cron v. Hargro Fabrics, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Simmtech Co. v. Barclays Bank PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Biocad JSC v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- In re Effexor Antitrust Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Optima Media Grp. Ltd. v. Bloomberg L.P.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.