Brown v. State

The appellant challenges an order by which his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion was summarily denied. We reverse the order in part because the appellant stated facially sufficient claims which were not refuted by attachments to the order.

The appellant entered a plea of guilty to robbery and armed robbery and was convicted of those offenses. He presented various claims of ineffective assistance of trial coun*989sel in his motion for post-conviction relief, and he alleged that he would not have pled-guilty but for his attorney’s ineffectiveness. His allegations regarding his…