Legal Opinion
Scm Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner v. Xerox Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 10, 1979No. 79-8018PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a motion by the plaintiff, SCM Corporation, not opposed by defendant, Xerox Corporation, for the allowance of appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SCM’s civil antitrust suit against Xerox alleged its exclusion from the plain paper copying market and sought both money damages and injunctive relief. After a fourteen-month trial, the jury found for SCM on some of its claims and for Xerox on others. The jury found against SCM and in favor of Xerox on (1) an alleged exclusion beginning in 1964; (2) a denial of an oppor tunity to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Acha v. BeameCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
3Cited by17 opinions
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Van Dyk Research Corporation, a Body Corporate of the State of New Jersey v. Xerox Corporation, a Body Corporate of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Isra Fruit Ltd., Plaintiff-Respondent v. Agrexco Agricultural Export Company Limited and Agrexco (u.s.a.) Ltd., Defendants-PetitionersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.