Legal Opinion

State v. Purvis

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 13, 1985No. 84-470PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This interlocutory appeal comes to us on report pursuant to V.R.A.P. 5(a) from the district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the State’s complaint charging him with lewd and lascivious conduct in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2601. The ques tion of law sought to be reviewed is as follows: Whether, as applied to the facts of this case, 13 V.S.A. § 2601 is unconstitutionally vague under the United States and Vermont Constitutions. We answer this certified question in the negative.

The State first argues that interlocutory review is inappropriate here because “factual distinctions could…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. State v. MillardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  4. State v. ElwellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. State v. ShippeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. State v. CantrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. State v. DeLaBruereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API