Legal Opinion

Jones v. Castro

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 11, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-0310PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge

In this case brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, Plaintiff Jerry Jones asserts retaliation and discrimination claims regarding actions of his employer, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). Before the Court is Plaintiffs [24] Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. Previously, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant’s [10] Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court granted the motion with respect to Plaintiffs retaliation claim and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. National Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. EllerbeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Lucas v. Casillas GuzmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  3. Robb v. PerdueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  4. Seiden v. Omni Hotels Management CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
  5. Tucker v. BlinkenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API