Giangotti v. Grauer

*969Defendants met their initial burden entitling them to summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ only submission in opposition was their attorney’s affidavit stating that there were jury issues concerning the site of the fall and whether the site had been acquired by defendants by adverse possession. That affidavit was insufficient to raise an issue of fact whether the fall occurred on defendants’ property (see, Bachrach v Farbenfabriken Bayer, 36 NY2d 696; Stewart v Town of Waterford, 152 AD2d 837; see also, GTF Mktg. v Colonial Aluminum Sales, 66 NY2d 965). It also failed to provide any factual basis…