Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Haugenoe v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2008No. 20070099Published

1ConcurrenceMcCULLOUGH, District Judge

[¶ 30] I must respectfully only concur in the result reached in the majority opinion.

[¶ 31] As the majority correctly notes, this case involves the issue of whether WSI has a subrogation interest in Hauge-noe’s legal malpractice settlement. The starting point for this analysis is section *38565-01-09 of the North Dakota Century Code. This statute grants WSI a subrogation interest in a covered worker’s recovery from a third party for a compensable injury. N.D.C.C. § 65-01-09. The Code defines “compensable injury,” in part, as follows:

“Compensable injury” means an injury by accident arising out of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Pyke v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Johnston's Fuel Liners, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Stewart v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API