Cowan v. Muskegon Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Diekerman, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMgG-rath, J.
Defendant company owns and operates a street railway at Muskegon. On October 20, 1889, it was engaged in extending and laying its tracks, and had excavated and dug up the ground on Lake street, and had thrown up quantities of dirt and rubbish into the street adjoining its tracks. Plaintiff’s buggy was being-driven upon the street in the night-time, and, coming upon one of these heaps of dirt, was capsized and injured, and plaintiff brought suit in justice’s court, recovered in that court, and defendant appealed to the circuit court, where plaintiff again recovered. .
*584Plaintiff’s declaration is…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Mullen v. City of OwossoMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Hall v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Ryan v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Noble v. St. Joseph & Benton Harbor Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.