Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Price v. Price

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 1977No. 50354Published

1ConcurrenceDoolin, Justice

I agree with the majority that the evidence does not support a finding the children were dependent and neglected as defined by the Act. In addition to the above basis for reversal, I find further error in the cavalier manner in which the hearing was conducted.

The law in Oklahoma requires a bifurcated juvenile hearing. The first phase is an adjudicatory hearing to determine whether the allegations of a petition are supported by the evidence and whether a child should be adjudged to be a ward of the court; the second phase is that of disposition, to determine what order of disposition should be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re the Marriage of TweetenMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gibson v. DorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Matter of PaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Stubben v. Flathead County Department of Public WelfareMontana Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API