Legal Opinion

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Moore

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 2002No. 24050PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Presiding Judge.

After Dewey Moore (“Dewey”) and his son, Dale Moore (“Dale”), disagreed regarding who owned and was entitled to possession of a backhoe, Dale surreptitiously took the backhoe from Dewey and concealed it in a Mend’s barn. Thereon, Dewey filed a claim with Bituminous Casualty Company (“Bituminous”) under a policy covering the backhoe which insured Dewey for theft losses. Bituminous promptly settled the claim with Dewey by paying $38,500 for the loss.

After learning Dale had the backhoe, Bituminous filed this case against Dale and Dewey seeking to recover its…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. David Ranken, Jr. Technical Institute v. BoykinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. McKean v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Law v. City of MaryvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Home of Hope, Inc. v. McDonaldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Ackerson v. Runaway II, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stotts v. Progressive Classic Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Kinder v. DandurandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API