Legal Opinion

State v. McGee

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 2014No. COA13-1161PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

The trial court did not err in instructing the jury that bail bondsmen cannot violate North Carolina motor vehicle laws in order to make an arrest. Defendant was not authorized to operate his motor vehicle at a speed greater than was reasonable and prudent under the existing conditions because of his status as a bail bondsman. The trial court’s instruction to the jury did not lessen the State’s burden of showing that defendant’s violation of North Carolina motor vehicle laws was intentional, willful, wanton, or reckless.

I. Factual and Procedural History

On the morning of 31…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. MathisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. VoltzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  3. State v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  5. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API