In re the Will of Rothchild
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCallahak, J.
An application to take testimony of witnesses residing outside the State by written interrogatories does not present an appropriate occasion to pass upon the merits of- an issue raised by the pleadings at least where the pleading is adequate on its face and there has been no direct attack upon it. (Wightman v. Wightman, 173 App. Div. 701; Ganni v. Stallman, 200 App. Div. 485; Bloede Co. v. Devine Co., 211 App. Div. 180; Moffat v. Phoenix Brewery Corporation, 247 App. Div. 552.)
The order should be reversed and the motion granted.
Martin", P. J., and Cohn", J., concur with Peck, J.; Callahan,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Victor G. Bloede Co. v. J. P. Devine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Moffat v. Phœnix Brewery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Ganni v. StallmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Wightman v. WightmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916