Commonwealth v. Brown
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CASTILLE, Justice.
This Court granted review of this matter to determine whether the Superior Court erred in determining that the Commonwealth did not violate Pa.R.Crim.P. 229 by amending the criminal information immediately prior to the commencement of trial to include the charges of Rape and Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (“IDSI”) with an unconscious person, 1 when the original information only included the charges of Rape and IDSI by forcible compulsion 2 and, if so, whether appellant suffered prejudice due to the violation of Rule 229. 3 For the reasons that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. DeSummaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by35 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SinclairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. WallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. EckroteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.