Legal Opinion

Karsman v. Portman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 1984No. 68952PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellant was obligated by a divorce decree to maintain medical insurance for his daughter. After she was severely injured in an automobile collision, appellant received payments under the policy in excess of $42,000. Appellees, appellant’s daughter and her mother, brought suit to recover the sums paid to appellant by his insurer. In an earlier appeal (Portman v. Karsman, 166 Ga. App. 398 (304 SE2d 399) (1983)), this court reversed a dismissal of the suit. Following the return of the case to the trial court, both sides moved for partial summary judgment. This appeal is from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mobley v. PhinizyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Healthdyne, Inc. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Hanover Insurance Company v. SCRUGGS COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Portman v. KarsmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Garmon v. Health Group of Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Jernigan Auto Parts, Inc. v. Commercial State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Harrell v. Louis Smith Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc. v. Hospital Authority of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1985
  5. Fudge v. COLONIAL BAKING COMPANY OF ATLANTACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API