Legal Opinion
Marcus v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
This controversy arises out of a claim by the widow of Morris Marcus to recover a death benefit alleged to be due her under option 1 of section 1720 of the Greater New York Charter.
Morris Marcus was in the city service as chief probation officer in the Domestic Relations Court and was a member of the defendant, New York City Employees’ Retirement System. He was retired on April 12, 1935, after he had passed the age of fifty-five years and had been over thirty-three years in service. The retire*112ment took effect as of May 1, 1935. Prior to that date the defendant advised the deceased as to his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Creveling v. Teachers' Ret. BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whitehill v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Guzman v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Zucker v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Dolan v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Cochran v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.