Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Crivelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon learning that other bus drivers were making more money than he was, claimant demanded a raise. When his employer refused to comply with claimant’s demand, claimant left his employment. While claimant contends that the pay differences constituted discrimination, in reality he quit due to his dissatisfaction with his wages, which is not a good cause for leaving one’s employment (see, Matter of Decker [Levine], 50 AD2d 1030, 1031; Matter of Weber [Catherwood], 32 AD2d 697). In fact, prior to the time that claimant quit, claimant was aware that the two drivers making more money had been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re the Claim of WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. In re the Claim of DeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. In re the Claim of KeefeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KilgallenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re the Claim of SahaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API