Legal Opinion

Borenstein v. Rochel Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 19, 1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about April 16, 1991, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from enforcing or executing upon a certain confession of judgment filed against the plaintiffs, and required the plaintiffs to post a $10,000 undertaking in favor of defendant Rochel Properties, Inc., unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs allege, inter alia, fraud in the inducement and lack of consideration, and seek damages and a permanent injunction against enforcement of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Kaufman v. International Business Machines Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. After Six, Inc. v. 201 East 66th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. After Six, Inc. v. 201 East 66th Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brad H. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Weeks Woodlands Ass'n v. Dormitory AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Chatham Towers, Inc. v. BloombergNew York Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Calo v. ChuiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. New York State Ass'n of Tobacco & Candy Distributors, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API