Legal Opinion

Frederick Smart v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 18, 2015No. 4D15-3969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Frederick Smart petitions for a writ of prohibition following the trial court’s denial of his motion for discharge, which claimed a violation of the speedy trial rule. “A writ of prohibition is an appropriate remedy ‘where an accused has been denied his right to a speedy trial and his motion for discharge has been denied.’” Dempsey v. State, 82 So.3d 928, 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (quoting Sherrod v. Franza, 427 So.2d 161, 163 (Fla.1983)). We-deny the petition on the merits and write to clarify when a trial commences within the meaning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(c).

Petitioner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Sherrod v. FranzaSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Maines v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Boudreaux v. HouseCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-2018 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
  3. Clifton Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2018 Regular-Cycle ReportSupreme Court of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API