Legal Opinion

Gornto v. City of Brunswick

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1969No. 44388PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. The Supreme Court, in transferring this case to this court, held that “[t]he constitutional questions made in the petition for writ of certiorari were not ruled upon by the trial court, and the sole question for review on this appeal is the dismissal of the petition for certiorari because of failure of service.” (Emphasis supplied.) Gornto v. City of Brunswick, 225 Ga. 128 (166 SE2d 349).

2. A statute providing for service should be construed to require personal service, as at common law, unless the contrary intent plainly appears or unless some other mode has been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hobby v. BunchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Robinson v. Bryson & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Toole v. Davenport & SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. Hendricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CITY OF DUNWOODY v. DISCOVERY PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, INC. Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. Fisher v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. City of Atlanta v. CagleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Ultra Group of Companies, Inc. v. Inam International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API