Turner v. Warden
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
The applicant contends that he should be granted relief because (a) he was not guilty of the offense of attempted armed robbery and (b) he was represented at his trial by incompetent counsel. The second contention was fully considered and disposed of by Judge Allen’s opinion in the trial court, and leave to appeal on that ground is denied for the reasons stated in his opinion.
Judge Allen’s opinion states that the only argument for relief presented at the hearing was that the petitioner was represented [at the original trial] by incompetent counsel appointed by the court. This suggests that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bell v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Gardner v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clarence Irvin Turner v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Roe v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Daniels v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960