Legal Opinion

Delancer v. Advanced Mortgage Investment Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 18, 1989No. 88-2842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant below appeals from a judgment entered against her after she failed to appear when the case was purportedly noticed for trial. We reverse for disposition on the merits both because (a) the record shows an unresolved issue as to whether the defendant actually received the notice of trial; see Intercontinental Properties, Inc. v. U.S. Security Services, Inc., 515 So.2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Hammett v. Hammett, 510 So.2d 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and (b) even assuming the defendant was properly noticed, the trial judge erred by, in effect, defaulting her in entering judgment without…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Belcher v. FerraraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Hammett v. HammettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Cluett v. KrystyniakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Intercontinental Properties, Inc. v. U.S. Security Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner Properties, Inc. v. MarchettaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Debello v. FaskeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API