Legal Opinion

State v. Floyd

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2000No. 98-2062-CRPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification from the court of appeals pursuant to Wis. Stat. (Rule) § 809.61 (1997-98). The defendant, Warrick D. Floyd, asserts that he is entitled to sentence credit for the time he spent in confinement on an armed robbery charge that was dismissed and read in for purposes of sentencing. Because we determine that Wis. Stat. §973.155(1) requires sentence credit for confinement on charges that are dismissed and read in at sentencing, we reverse and remand for a recalculation of Floyd's sentence credit.

¶ 2. The facts are undisputed. On February 5, 1997,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Embry v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. CastilloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Klimas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. BeetsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. SchaeferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Robinson v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. McClarenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API