People v. Mixon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was deprived of his constitutional right to a public trial because the Trial Judge conducted a portion of the jury voir dire in chambers. Because defendant failed to object to that procedure, his contention has not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; see also, People v Baxter, 177 AD2d 1003, lv denied 79 NY2d 943; People v Baez, 162 AD2d 602, lv denied 76 NY2d 852), and we decline to consider it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6]).
Defendant further contends that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- People v. ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. TolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. MixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Mixon v. SeditaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- People v. MixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.