Legal Opinion

Houck v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 13, 1994No. 92-3396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant seeks review of both his convictions and his sentences. He raises four issues: (1) whether the trial court committed reversible error when it denied his motion for a continuance so that he might attempt to locate potential defense witnesses; (2) whether the trial court committed reversible error when it sentenced him to consecutive mandatory minimum terms for armed robbery and armed kidnapping; (3) whether the trial court committed reversible error when it sentenced him to fifty years as an habitual felony offender for armed robbery, a first-degree…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamont v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Mason v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API