Legal Opinion

Ohio River Contract Co. v. Gordon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1917No. 594PublishedCited by 32 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

In July, 1914, one-Haines sued the Ohio River Contract Company, the plaintiff in error, and Swisher, one of its employees, in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Kentucky, to recover damages resulting from personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the defendants while Haines was in the employ of the company. The defendant company by appropriate pleadings challenged the power of -the court to entertain the suit both because of the want of. jurisdiction over the corporation and over the subject-matter of the suit. Briefly the facts were these:

The Contract Company…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gromer v. Standard Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Western Life Indemnity Co. of Ill. v. RuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Mater v. HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. Gearheart v. Haskell BurressSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API