Legal Opinion

Iles v. Heidenreich

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 14, 1916No. Gen. No. 21,709PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Denis E. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Interpleader—when bringing of action of conversion against complainant not a defense. Where a bill of interpleader alleges that a specific fund is in the hands of complainant, to which fund adverse claims are made by two parties, it is no defense to the bill that it sets up the fact that one of the claimants brought an action of tort for conversion against complainant, thereby, as claimant claims, making her claim that of damages for conversion, and not to the specific fund, where in her answer such…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Iles v. HeidenreichIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API