Legal Opinion
Michalowski v. Ey
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1959PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
The plaintiff Michalowsld instituted this action some years ago in order to procure the return of an automobile *73and damages for its wrongful detention. The case was previously here in 1958, on which occasion we reversed the Appellate Division’s dismissal of the complaint and stated that “ the plaintiff is entitled to recover both possession of the car and damages for its wrongful detention ” (4 N Y 2d 277, 282). Accordingly, we remitted the case to the trial court for “ the assessment of damages ”.
The damages have now been assessed; the trial court fixed them at $6,253.34, but the Appellate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Corning v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Arnold v. . AngellNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Rogers v. New York & Texas Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Cody v. First National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Riggs, Ferris & Geer v. Harrison LillibridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- In re Jacqueline F.New York Surrogate's Court · 1978
- Long Island Trust Co. v. Porta Aluminum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Franjo Transport, Inc. v. B & K Fleet Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.