Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Territilli

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 6, 1915No. Gen. No. 20,855PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William Fenimore Cooper, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pam

There is no controversy on any question of fact, the only question for review being one of law as to the construction of the contract between the said Territilli and Scully and the appellant, under which the work was being done at the time plaintiff’s intestate met his death. Both in the brief filed and in the oral argument made before this court, counsel for the appellant admitted that the only question in the case was whether or not, under the contract of employment, the relationship existing between Territilli and Scully and the appellant was that of independent contractor or that of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pioneer Fireproof Construction Co. v. HansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Linnehan v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Foster v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. City of Chicago v. MurdockIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Boyd v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oliveira v. New Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. Warput v. Reading Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  3. Best Manufacturing Co. v. Peoria Creamery Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  4. Oliveira v. New Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API