Legal Opinion

Stangel v. Parker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1997No. 97-0181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Frank Stangel, appellant before the Second Court of Appeals, moved that court to extend the time for filing his motion for rehearing. Appellees did not oppose Stan-gel’s motion. The court of appeals denied Stangel’s motion. Stangel now seeks relief from this Court under Tex.R.App. P. 100(g). Because Stangel’s timely motion reasonably explains his need for additional time, we grant Stangel relief from the court of appeals’ order.

The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment against Stangel on January 9, 1997. A few days later, Stangel’s trial counsel informed Stangel by letter that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Head v. Twelfth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Nolan v. RamseyTexas Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jose "Joe" Hinojosa v. Firefighters & Police Officers' Civil Service Commission of the City of Laredo, Texas Irma Mireles, Vidal Cantu, Jr. & Jesus Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  2. Kidd v. Paxton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  3. Kidd v. Paxton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API