Legal Opinion
Central National Bank of Mattoon v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. Maryland
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 31, 1963No. Nos. 14032-14036PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILEY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants in Nos. 14032-14035 have appealed from summary judgments entered against them in their actions against the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland on its statutory Public Grain Warehouseman’s Bond.1 2Fidelity has taken a “precautionary appeal” in No. 14036 from an adverse judgment in Croxen’s action.
Appellants loaned money to C. R. Acord, Fidelity’s principal, a licensed public grain warehouseman in Illinois, and took his notes secured by warehouse receipts. All of the receipts in question were issued by Acord as “Licensed Warehouseman.” Those held by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hannah v. People ex rel. Attorney GeneralIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- The Fidelity State Bank, a Corporation v. Central Surety and Insurance Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Central States Corporation v. Trinity Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aetna Insurance Company v. Junction Warehouse CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Wheaton v. RamseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Central National Bank of Mattoon v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Third-Party v. Kansas State Bank, Third-Party Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Third-Party v. The Charleston National Bank, Third-Party Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Third-Party v. William D. Burnside, Third-Party Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Third-Party v. Lulu W. Juntgen, Third-Party Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Third-Party v. Eugene Croxen, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963