Legal Opinion

In Re Houtchens

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 12, 1977No. 59454PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

“The Advisory Committee”, created by Rule 5, 1 did on March 2, 1976, charge respondent, Richard K. Houtchens, with conduct violative of various Disciplinary Rules 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, Rule 4.

On April 20, 1976, the Honorable Noah Weinstein was appointed Master to take testimony and report findings of fact and conclusions of law. The same have been filed, arguments made and the cause submitted.

Respondent does not challenge the factual findings of the Master; and, for that reason, it is sufficient that we only detail a summarized version thereof.

COUNT I: That respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. In Re LurkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. In re O'BrienSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Janssen v. Guaranty Land Title Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Matter of MendellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. In Re MaierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Matter of LowtherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  5. In re HaggertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API