Legal Opinion

Stauf v. Holden

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 3, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

94 So.2d 361 (1957)

Martin G. STAUF, Appellant,

v.

Allen HOLDEN and Daniel J. Harkins, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc.

February 13, 1957.

On Rehearing April 3, 1957.

Further Rehearing Denied May 2, 1957.

E.F.P. Brigham and Brigham, Black, Niles & Wright, Miami, for appellant.

Reece & Murray, Miami, for appellee Allen Holden.

Royal Flagg Jonas, Miami Beach, for appellee Daniel J. Harkins.

2Per curiam 1

Affirmed.

HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.

TERRELL, C.J., and THOMAS, J., dissent.

On Rehearing Granted

3Per curiam 2

On rehearing granted we have reconsidered appellant's assignment of error…

4Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foster v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

5Cited by5 opinions

  1. DeLaughter v. WomackMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Torrez v. RaagAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Klose v. COASTAL EMERGENCY SERVICESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Kremser v. KeithanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Zaretsky v. JacobsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API