Legal Opinion

Laudico v. Netzel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this combined CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action seeking, *812inter alia, a declaration that respondents’ refusal to pay General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits to correction officers injured while on duty, Other than “as a direct result of contact with an inmate”, is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion and violative of law. Petitioners sought General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits retroactive to the date of their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Erie County Agricultural Society v. ClucheyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Crawford v. Sheriff's DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Maresco v. RozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF THEROUX v. ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. D'Accursio v. Monroe CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Theroux v. ReillyNew York Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API