Legal Opinion
Etalco, Inc. v. AMK Industries, Inc. (In Re Etalco, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 2001No. BAP No. WW-00-1630-RRyH. Bankruptcy No. 99-14017. Adversary No. 00-07484PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSELL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The appellant, a Washington-based company, filed its voluntary chapter 11 2 petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington. The appellant and appellee, a Nevada-based company with its principal place of business in California, entered into a postpetition contract for the transport of a 350-ton piece of equipment from California to Texas. The contract was executed in California and all transactions pursuant to the contract took place in California and Texas.
A dispute between the parties arose as to the amount due for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re: Malcolm Curtis and Judith CurtisUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- North v. Winterthur Assurances (In Re North)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2002