Legal Opinion
Lai v. City and County of Honolulu
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 14, 1983No. Civ. 78-355PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, OR ALTERNATIVELY, FOR A NEW TRIAL
SAMUEL P. KING, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs move to amend the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (hereinafter “Findings”) filed May 18,1983, 562 F.Supp. 903 (D.Hawaii 1983), on eight different grounds. Each assertion shall be dealt with in turn.
I
Plaintiffs assert that the Findings are contrary to the weight of the evidence and the applicable law. Plaintiffs cite no authority for this assertion, nor do they point to specific evidence adduced at trial to counter the Findings of this court.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Eddie CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT Et Al., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Figueroa v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Fred A. ZUNIGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMFAC FOODS, INC., D/B/A Wilhelm Foods, Inc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Altair Corporation, Formerly Caribbean Finance Co., Inc. v. Carmen Pesquera De Busquets and Angel S. BiaggiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Bush v. RewaldDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
- Clifford Y.C. Lai and Victoria L. Lai v. City and County of Honolulu, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- McCarthy v. Pacific Loan, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
- Centro Médico Del Turabo, Inc. v. Feliciano De MelecioDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004