Legal Opinion

Austenal Laboratories, Inc. v. Nobilium Processing Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 5, 1957No. 53 C 1316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an action alleging infringement of patent No. 2,461,416, entitled “Pattern Material, Pattern and Method”, granted *710February 8, 1949, to Reiner W. Erdle and Charles H. Schaar. Plaintiff, Austenal Laboratories, Inc., acquired the patent by assignment from Erdle and Schaar.

The patent in suit relates to a ready-made casting pattern for use in casting metal dentures and other articles as a substitute for the wax patterns which had previously been used for that purpose. Of the nineteen claims recited in the patent, plaintiff relies on fifteen (that is, claims 1-3,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re AndersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Arthur T. Broche v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API