Legal Opinion
Harrington v. Gardner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 23, 1966No. 64 Civ. 3282PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge.
Motion by the defendant pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order granting summary judgment, is granted. The cross motion by the plaintiff for the same relief, is denied. The court affirms the decision of the Secretary.
The plaintiff, Cornelius P. Harrington, instituted this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) 1 to review the adverse decision *290of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare on the plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The plaintiff maintains that he is disabled within the meaning of 42…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clistie Bell Thomas v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Philip Kerner v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Shirley A. Ber v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Oveta Culp Hobby, Secretary of Department of Health, Education and Welfare v. Joseph HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Walker v. AltmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Torres v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH EDUCATION AND WELFAREDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971
- Patrocinia Meneses v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Patrocinia Meneses v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971