Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 16, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILLY, Justice:

Defendant appeals from his Superior Court conviction of escape (11 Del.C. § 1253). 1 based upon his failure to return from a 48-hour furlough to the Sussex Correctional Institution where he was serving a Superior Court sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant contends that his failure to return from furlough does not constitute an “escape” because he was not “in custody” while on furlough. He relies on U. S. v. Person, S.D.Cal., 223 F.Supp. 982 (1963) which applied the rule of strict construction and held that failure to return from furlough was not punishable as an escape under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. James Woodrow RudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  2. People v. HaskinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Johnson v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. BeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Forrest Dale McCullough Jr. v. United States of America, Ronald D. Wyatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. RoundstoneMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bryson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API