Legal Opinion

Bank v. Labitut

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

At chambers. This cause came up at the April term, 1S70, on motion to reinstate interventions and third oppositions which had been dismissed at a previous term.

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

Alex. E. Prewett and the Northern Bank of Kentucky each recovered judgment in this court on the law side against Jules Labitut, the defendant, on which executions were issued and levied on defendant’s crop of sugar and molasses, made by him on his plantation in the year 1869. Before the sale under the execution, Octave Hopkins filed his intervention and third opposition in his own behalf, and an intervention and third opposition in behalf of a large number of other persons, of whom he alleges himself to be the agent and attorney in fact. In this intervention he claims…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HayesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1881
  2. United States v. MaloneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1881
  3. Allen v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1884
  4. United States v. MillingerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API