Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Sangamon Loan & Trust Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1920No. 13361PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. E. S. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

The question raised by this writ of error is the construction to be given clause 3 of the will of Patrick Canty. After directing the payment of his debts he devised and bequeathed the remainder of his property, consisting principally of farm lands in Sangamon county and residence property in Springfield, to a trustee to manage and control, with directions to pay the income in equal shares to his son, William B. Canty, and his two daughters, Catherine Billington and Mary Kramer. The third clause then provided : “At the death of all my said children herein named, I hereby will, devise and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Addicks v. AddicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Casey v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Dyslin v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. In Re Hicks EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Kiesling v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API